USPTO serial 75431083
IMCOPEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMCOPEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT & GOULD3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55101-1786Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | incidentals and supplies for data processing equipment, computers, facsimile machines, printers for computers, photocopies and photocopy-machines, namely, toner cartridges, laser printer cartridges, and ink drum cartridges and toner drum cartridges | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | data processors; computers; facsimile machines; printers for computers, photocopies and photocopy machines; computer carrying cases; blank computer discs, including blank computer hard discs; blank magnetic computer tape; and multimedia CD-ROM software | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | incidentals and supplies for data processing equipment, computers, facsimile machines, printers for computers, photocopies and photocopy-machines, namely, ink ribbons and pen ink cartridges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |