Drawing for TELL US WHERE IT HURTS

USPTO serial 75432391

TELL US WHERE IT HURTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELL US WHERE IT HURTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035computer software development project management servicesACTIVE—
041training services, namely, conducting seminars and classes relating to project risk managementACTIVE—
042computer software design and integration services for others; computer software development services; help desk services, namely, consulting services with regard to computers, computer software and computer systems; consulting services in the field of analysis and detection of year 2000 compliance of software programs; and information systems planning, assessment and migration services in the field of computer systems, namely, aiding in the transition from one computer system to another computer systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 25, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 20, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Apr 22, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 3, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 26, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 18, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance