USPTO serial 75434679
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PolyIonix Separation Technologies, Inc.
North Charleston, SC
Other trademarks owned by PolyIonix Separation Technologies, Inc.
PolyIonix Separation Technologies, Inc.
North Charleston, SC
Other trademarks owned by PolyIonix Separation Technologies, Inc.
PolyIonix Separation Technologies, Inc.
North Charleston, SC
Other trademarks owned by PolyIonix Separation Technologies, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUSSELL W PYLE
RUSSELL W PYLE JUETTNER PYLE PIONTEK & UNDERWOOD221 N LASALLE ST STE 850CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polymers used to separate metal and other ions from fluids and solids for use in the metal recovery industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 21, 1998 |
| 007 | Separators for the cleaning and purification of liquids and fluids to separate metal and other ions for use in the metal recovery industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 21, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |