USPTO serial 75449419
ENCODEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENCODEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-90319 Nuernberg, DE
D-90319 Nuernberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID TOREN
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING STATISTICAL INFORMATION COMPILED AS A RESULT OF ECONOMIC TRADE AND MARKET ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH; BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES, INCLUDING BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION CONSULTATION SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE ECONOMIC FIELD VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA IN THE ECONOMIC FIELD; ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF PRODUCT-RELATED DATA IN THE ECONOMIC FIELD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |