Drawing for HOMEADVISOR

USPTO serial 75451428

HOMEADVISOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMEADVISOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEVIN S. COSTANZA

KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, PL701 FIFTH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for providing information concerning real estate, real estate financing, real estate agents and the purchase, sale and rental of real estate, and for the calculation of information concerning real estate purchasing and financingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 7, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 24, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 13, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 30, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 24, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance