Drawing for COMPONENTS FOR A MODERN WORLD

USPTO serial 75459502

COMPONENTS FOR A MODERN WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPONENTS FOR A MODERN WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK A HERSHEY

MARK A HERSHEY STRADLEY RONON STEVENS & YOUNG LLP2600 ONE COMMERCE SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND METALLURGICAL COMPONENTSACTIVEMar 27, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 16, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance