USPTO serial 75460290
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B G HOROWITZ
ROBERT B G HOROWITZ COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper articles, namely banners, flags, name badges, paper table napkins, paper table linens, paper party decorations; paper, namely, writing paper, bond paper, copy paper, letter paper, computer printout paper, paper for packaging, receipt books and invoice forms; cardboard; printed publications, namely manuals; magazines, books, booklets, brochures, pamphlets, leaflets, catalogs, diaries, calendars all in the field of commerce, industry, sale and business promotion; unmounted photographic prints; stationery; plastic materials for packaging, namely, bubble packs, bags, envelopes and pouches for merchandise packaging; cards, namely, note cards, blank cards, file cards, flash cards, greeting cards; printed forms, printed labels, paper identification tags, file folders, writing pads, memo pads, note books, posters, envelopes, bookbinding materials in the nature of cloth, wire and tape; printed paper signs; office requisites, namely, paper weights, staplers, staples, machine ribbons, punches and rubber bands; wrapping papers and boxes, namely, cardboard boxes, corrugated record storage boxes, paper boxes, carton boxes, pencil boxes, stationery boxes, file boxes for storage of business and personal records, and souvenir boxes made from paper | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |