USPTO serial 75461855
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Berkshire,R012-1HN, GB
Scott Valley, CA
Scott Valley, CA
Berkshire,R012-1HN, GB
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)
Armonk, NY
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)
Armonk, NY
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M IRIS HESS
M IRIS HESS LADAS & PARRY LAW OFFICE5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5679UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail store services featuring computers, electronics, and data processors; mail order catalog and telephone order services featuring computers, electronics and data processors | ACTIVE | Aug 20, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |