USPTO serial 75464094
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN M NOLAN
JOHN M NOLAN PATENT DEPTDEERE & COMOLINE, IL 61265UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mechanical engine parts for construction vehicles; oil and hydraulic pumps for construction vehicles; alternators, starters, fan drives, torque converters, turbochargers, mufflers, exhaust manifolds and couplings for use therewith, and radiators for construction vehicles; construction equipment parts, namely scraper pins and bushings, cutting edges and bucket teeth | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Oil pressure gauges, water temperature gauges, transmission oil temperature gauges, fuses and switches for construction vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lamps for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Mechanical parts for transmissions for construction vehicles, namely housing assemblies, pistons, friction plates, seals and gaskets, bearings and bearing assemblies, planetary assemblies; mechanical final drive parts for construction vehicles, namely clutches, pinions, support assemblies, shafts, gears, hubs, sprockets, adjustment nuts, holder assemblies and cages; mechanical final drive parts for construction vehicles, namely planet gears and shafts, ring gears, bearings, seals, sun gears and seal groups; and seats for construction vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |