Drawing for VALUEPART

USPTO serial 75464094

VALUEPART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALVES, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALUEPART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN M NOLAN

JOHN M NOLAN PATENT DEPTDEERE & COMOLINE, IL 61265UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical engine parts for construction vehicles; oil and hydraulic pumps for construction vehicles; alternators, starters, fan drives, torque converters, turbochargers, mufflers, exhaust manifolds and couplings for use therewith, and radiators for construction vehicles; construction equipment parts, namely scraper pins and bushings, cutting edges and bucket teethACTIVE—
009Oil pressure gauges, water temperature gauges, transmission oil temperature gauges, fuses and switches for construction vehiclesACTIVE—
011Lamps for land vehiclesACTIVE—
012Mechanical parts for transmissions for construction vehicles, namely housing assemblies, pistons, friction plates, seals and gaskets, bearings and bearing assemblies, planetary assemblies; mechanical final drive parts for construction vehicles, namely clutches, pinions, support assemblies, shafts, gears, hubs, sprockets, adjustment nuts, holder assemblies and cages; mechanical final drive parts for construction vehicles, namely planet gears and shafts, ring gears, bearings, seals, sun gears and seal groups; and seats for construction vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 31, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 29, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance