USPTO serial 75475022
INTENSE POPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTENSE POPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTHA I. CECIL
MARTHA I CECIL HERSHEY CHOCOLATE & CONFECTIONARY CORP5060 WARD RDWHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Candy | ACTIVE | Feb 21, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Homestead, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Homestead, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HERSHEY CHOCOLATE & CONFECTIONERY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named INTENSE POPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |