USPTO serial 75475069
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PRIMUS KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
SEATTLE, WA
PRIMUS KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
SEATTLE, WA
PRIMUS KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
SEATTLE, WA
Seattle, WA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEIDI L SACHS
HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the creation, storage, retrieval, distribution, management and maintenance of problem solution information, and instruction manuals sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |