USPTO serial 75476147
EYE Q.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2540792Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2002
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EYE Q.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoroff, Greg; Stephen F. Rohde
Victoroff, Greg; Stephen F. Rohde Rohde & Victoroff1880 Century Park EastSuite 411Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Graphic art design services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |