Drawing for BETTER BODY BASICS

USPTO serial 75478788

BETTER BODY BASICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2657505Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 10, 2002
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETTER BODY BASICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005food supplements for use by women in reducing cellulite consisting of natural substances, namely alfalfaSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJan 8, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2022C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 16, 2022CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 29, 2022CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 28, 2022E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2022PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 10, 2021REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 17, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 10, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 12, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 21, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 10, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance