USPTO serial 75481054
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A KESSLER
DAVID A KESSLER LEWIS GOLDBERG & BALL PC1320 OLD CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 360MCLEAN, VA 22101-3930UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL INSTRUCTION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, ENGLISH, HISTORY, GEOGRAPHY, CHEMISTRY, PHYSICS, FOREIGN LANGUAGES, WRITING AND COLLEGE AND GRADUATE SCHOOL ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND OTHER ELECTRONIC MEDIA | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |