USPTO serial 75500696
MITZVAHMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MITZVAHMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL D FISHMAN
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | COMIC BOOKS AND MAGAZINES IN THE FIELD OF JEWISH CULTURE, EDUCATION AND FOLKLORE, CHILDREN'S BOOKS, STORIES IN ILLUSTRATED FORM, COMIC STRIPS, TRADING CARDS AND POSTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON LINE COMIC BOOKS, MAGAZINES THAT FEATURE STORIES, STORIES IN ILLUSTRATED FORM AND COMIC STRIPS IN THE FIELD OF JEWISH CULTURE, EDUCATION AND FOLKLORE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |