Drawing for INTELLIGENT NETWORK INTERFACE

USPTO serial 75510925

INTELLIGENT NETWORK INTERFACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIGENT NETWORK INTERFACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANIK MARCOVICI

JANIK MARCOVICI PERMAN & GREEN LLP425 POST RDFAIRFIELD, CT 06430-6232UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic components and systems; namely, transmitters, receivers, electronic and microwave components and systems for use in communication systems in providing digital subscriber linesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 12, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 17, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 30, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 18, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance