Drawing for A BETTER WAY

USPTO serial 75518525

A BETTER WAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A BETTER WAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CATHERINE H STOCKELL

CATHERINE H STOCKELL PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICANEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICS, NAMELY, MASCARA, BLUSHER, FOUNDATION MAKE-UP, LIPSTICK, LIP GLOSS, LIP CONTOUR PENCIL AND EYE SHADOW, SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FACE AND BODY CREAM, FACE AND BODY LOTION, SKIN MOISTURIZER, SKIN TONER, SOAP FOR PERSONAL USE, NIGHT CREAM, HAND CREAM, FACE MASQUES, BODY POWDER, MAKE-UP REMOVER, MILK BATH, FACE AND BODY SCRUBS, EYE MOISTURIZING DROPS, ESSENTIAL BODY OILS, AROMA THERAPY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, AROMA CREAMS FOR USE ON THE BODY, AROMA OILS FOR USE ON THE BODY AND AROMA LOTIONS FOR USE ON THE BODY, BATH AND SHOWER GELS, NON-MEDICATED SCALP TREATMENTS, ANTI-AGING CREAM, ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM, SKIN CREAM WITH ANTI-IRRITANT ADDITIVES, ANTI-DRYNESS MOISTURIZING CREAM, HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, RINSES, THICKENERS AND ENRICHERS, COLOGNE, PERFUME, BATH OIL, BUBBLE BATH, TOILET WATER, PERFUMED SOAP, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL CREAMS, CUTICLE CREAMS, HERBAL SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HERBAL LOTION, HERBAL BALM, HERBAL CREAM, HERBAL MASSAGE OIL, HERBAL FACE CLEANER, HERBAL TONER, HERBAL HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HERBAL SHAMPOOS, HERBAL CONDITIONERS, HERBAL RINSES, HERBAL THICKENERS AND HERBAL ENRICHERS, HERBAL BATH OIL, AND HERBAL BATH SACHETACTIVE—
009PRERECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES AND MULTI-MEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD ROMS ON TOPICS ADDRESSING THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMS AND DISEASES IN WOMEN FROM PERI-MENOPAUSE THROUGH POST-MENOPAUSEACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING SEMINARS ADDRESSING THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMS AND DISEASES IN WOMEN FROM PERI-MENOPAUSE THROUGH POST-MENOPAUSEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance