USPTO serial 75518545
HITEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDMAN, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HITEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM J BURKE
WILLIAM J BURKE SARNOFF CORPORATION201 WASHINGTON RD CN 5300PRINCETON, NJ 08540-5300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | TESTING OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, TEMPERATURE AND VIBRATION TESTING OF ELECTRONIC SUB-ASSEMBLIES AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |