USPTO serial 75524850
MY PONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MY PONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1, 333010 Osoppo (UD, IT
1, 333010 Osoppo (UD, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY K MEADWAY
BARBARA L DELANEY PEPPER HAMILTON3000 TWO LOGAN SQ 18TH & ARCH STSPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, namely, child's bouncing ride-on balls with handles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |