Drawing for BIRTHDAY BALLOONS

USPTO serial 75529793

BIRTHDAY BALLOONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIRTHDAY BALLOONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035mark designating mail-order gift-balloonACTIVEJul 7, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 9, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 24, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 23, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 23, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 21, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 21, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 15, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 27, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 14, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 24, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 23, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 16, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 16, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 17, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 17, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 14, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 17, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 17, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 22, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 19, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 18, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 16, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 20, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 20, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 14, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 7, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 11, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 28, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 3, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 3, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 17, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 15, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1998PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Nov 23, 1998PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance