Drawing for FRESH FROM THE FARM

USPTO serial 75545723

FRESH FROM THE FARM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH FROM THE FARM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lewis F. Gould, Jr.

LEWIS F GOULD JR DUANE MORRIS & HECKSCHER LLPONE LIBERTY PLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7396UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail grocery store and supermarket services featuring a complete line of fresh fruits and vegetableACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 24, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 16, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 13, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 13, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 25, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 31, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance