USPTO serial 75549795
CONSERVATION LEADERSHIP NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 2002
- Examiner
- RUPP, BRIAN
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONSERVATION LEADERSHIP NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H. Dougherty, Jr., Esq.
Charles H. Dougherty, Jr., Esq. REED SMITH LLPPO BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-0488UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | [ CONSERVATION LEADERSHIP NETWORK FOR FINANCIAL SPONSORSHIP OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES TO PROMOTE THE CONSERVATION OF AMERICAN LAND AND WATER RESOURCES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 1998 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES TO PROMOTE THE CONSERVATION OF AMERICAN LAND AND WATER RESOURCES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION AT THE COLLEGE AND POST-GRADUATE LEVEL, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAMS, AND CONFERENCES FOR THE EXCHANGE OF IDEAS AND INFORMATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 7, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |