USPTO serial 75553187
STARGRAPHS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARGRAPHS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devon A. Rolf
DEVON A ROLF SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLPONE KANSAS CITY PL1200 MAIN STKANSAS CITY, MO 64105-2118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, POSTERS, PAMPHLETS AND BROCHURES IN THE FIELD OF ATHLETICS AND ENTERTAINMENT AND TICKETS FOR ACCESSING AN EVENT; MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS; AND TRADING CARDS BEARING ORIGINAL SIGNATURES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SIGNATURE AUTHENTICATION IN RELATION TO CELEBRITY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DeFabio, Daniel J., Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by DeFabio, Daniel J., Jr.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STARGRAPHS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |