USPTO serial 75554902
BBJ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BBJ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD M. NEWMAN
GERALD M NEWMAN SCHOENBERG, FISHER, NEWMAN ET AL222 S RIVERSIDE PLZ #2100CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER, TABLE MATS NOT OF PAPER, FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TABLE LINEN, TABLE SKIRTS, UNFITTED FABRIC CHAIR COVERS AND CLOTH BANNERS | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2001 |
| 026 | DECORATIVE TEXTILE TRIMMINGS, NAMELY, CHAIR TIES | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2001 |
| 042 | RENTAL OF TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER, TABLE MATS NOT OF PAPER, FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TABLE LINEN, TABLE SKIRTS, UNFITTED FABRIC CHAIR COVERS, CHAIR TIES AND CLOTH BANNERS | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BBJ Rentals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BBJ Rentals, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BBJ
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |