USPTO serial 75559963
KANNY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KANNY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
00510 Helsinki, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMIE R. SHELDEN
JAMIE R SHELDEN ESQ COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for transmitting signals between mobile telephones, computer software and crediting and debiting accounts for use in connection with road toll systems and vending machines; computer software for transmitting signals between mobile telephones and remote systems for opening and closing doors; computer software for identity authentication | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | electronic funds transfer; credit card services featuring a global telecommunication network which debits and credits accounts based on input from cellular telephones | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | rental of computer programs and software; providing access to databases in the field of electronic identity authorization, crediting and debiting accounts, and transmitting signals between mobile telephones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |