USPTO serial 75561030
QHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kariya-city, Aichi-pref., JP
Kariya-city, Aichi-pref., JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Kruse
PAUL W KRUSE PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP1100 NEW YORK AVE 9TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TWO DIMENSIONAL DATA CODE READERS; BAR CODE READERS; TWO DIMENSIONAL CODE SCANNERS; BAR CODE DATA SCANNERS; ELECTRONIC DATABASE FEATURING TWO DIMENSIONAL CODES RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA AND CAPABLE OF BEING READ BY TWO DIMENSIONAL CODE READERS AND SCANNERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR TWO DIMENSIONAL CODE DRAWING, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR BAR CODE DRAWING, COMPUTER PROGRAM RECORDED ON COMPACT DISKS FOR TWO DIMENSIONAL CODE DRAWING; AND COMPUTER PROGRAM RECORDED ON MEMORY CARDS FOR TWO DIMENSIONAL CODE DRAWING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |