USPTO serial 75575444
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
171 36 Solna, SE
171 36 Solna, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN LEZDEY
JOHN LEZDEY FT HARRISONJOHN LEZDEY & ASSOCIATES1409 N FORT HARRISON AVE STE ACLEARWATER, FL 33755-2421| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DIAGNOSTIC CHEMICALS FOR ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING, AND REAGENTS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF MICROORGANISMS FOR SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PLASTIC STRIPS CARRYING REAGENTS SUCH AS ANTIBIOTICS, DISPENSERS FOR PLASTIC STRIPS CARRYING REAGENTS, SWABS, AGAR PLATES AND VIALS FOR ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING AND FOR IDENTIFICATION OF MICROORGANISMS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |