USPTO serial 75578756
IN FERMENTUM VERITAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2842047Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2004
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IN FERMENTUM VERITAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1000 BRUSSELS, BE
B - 1000 Brussels, BE
B - 1000 Brussels, BE
B - 1000 Brussels, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | (Based on 44(e)) clothing, namely, shorts, shirts, blouses, tops, slacks, trousers, skirts, dresses, jackets, coats, raincoats, capes, overalls, scarves, caps, hats, sweatshirts, jogging suits, sweat bands, wrist bands, beachwear, ski wear, jump suits, leg warmers, leggings, t-shirts, tank tops, sweaters, cardigans, vests, belts, ties, swimwear, wristbands, gloves, neckwear, and head wear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | (Based on 44(e)) Beers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e)) Restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INBEV S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Interbrew S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Interbrew S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Interbrew S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IN FERMENTUM VERITAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |