USPTO serial 75581289
PREMISNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREMISNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-14167 Berlin-Zehlendorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B. STEWART
ANNA W MANVILLE MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Connecting elements for communication networks and data networks, specifically terminal strips, isolating plug connectors and connecting blocks provided with electric contacts, receptacle outlets; leads for cables and cable clamps, connecting cables and connecting cords, single mode and multi mode signal transmission optical fibers, copper plugs,optical fiber plugs, connectors, printed circuit board connectors, optical fiber couplings,protection modules with surge arresters, shield clamps, connecting frames, contoured-section frames and housings for the fiber couplings, protection modules with surge arresters, shield clamps, connecting frames, contoured- section frames and housings for the above-named connecting elements, in particular for use in principal and secondary distribution systems,cable distribution cabinets, branch points and terminal heads; drawer units for housings; optical and electronic connectors, splicers, splice trays, fiber patch cords used to make an optical or electronic connection with optical or electronic plugs and cables with light wave or electrical transmission; modems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |