USPTO serial 75582713
WALTZING MATILDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WALTZING MATILDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
QUEENSLAND 4169, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian H. Batzli
BRIAN H BATZLI MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL THEMES, PHOTOGRAPHIC SLIDE TRANSPARENCIES, PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPES FEATURING HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL THEMES; PRERECORDED AUDIOCASSETTES FEATURING HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL THEMES; COMPACT DISCS FEATURING HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL THEMES, BLANK AUDIO DISCS, BLANK VIDEO DISCS FOR RECORDING, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FEATURING INSTRUCTION IN HISTORY AND ETHNOGRAPHY, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE, EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER PROGRAMS FEATURING HISTORICAL TOPICS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS TO CONTROL AND IMPROVE COMPUTER AND AUDIO EQUIPMENT SOUND QUALITY FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF CINEMATOGRAPHY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |