Drawing for GREAT SCOTT

USPTO serial 75594952

GREAT SCOTT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREAT SCOTT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hand cream, body lotion, liquid body powder, lip balm, pumice hand soap, aloe vera after-sun body care products, bar skin soaps, liquid hand soaps, body sunscreens, antiperspirants, hair shampoo and conditioner, hair styling gels, hair spray, shaving cream, after-shave lotionsACTIVEJun 1, 1964
005Medicated hand cream, medicated lip balm, antibacterial liquid hand soap, antiseptic hand sanitizer gel, liniments, medicated body sunscreensACTIVEJun 1, 1964

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 26, 2001PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Dec 1, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance