Drawing for E-MAIL USER INTERFACE

USPTO serial 75596828

E-MAIL USER INTERFACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-MAIL USER INTERFACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009FEATURE OF WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT COMPUTER PROGRAMS WHICH LINKS DECISION MAKERS TO THOSE WITH INFORMATION REGARDING WORKFORCE PERSONNEL ACROSS THE ENTERPRISEACTIVEAug 9, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 16, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 15, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 8, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 1, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 24, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 28, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance