USPTO serial 75614056
XWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2809635Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2004
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 4B8, CA
St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 4B8, CA
BELL ALIANT REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
ST JOHN'S, NL, CA
Other trademarks owned by BELL ALIANT REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BELL ALIANT REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
ST JOHN'S, CA
Other trademarks owned by BELL ALIANT REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
ST JOHN'S, CA
ST. JOHN'S NEWFOUNDLAND, CA
ST. JOHN'S NEWFOUNDLAND, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
Donald L. Dennison Dennison, Schultz & MacDonald1727 King StreetSuite 105Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | COMPUTER INSTALLATION AND REPAIR; ON-SITE AND REMOTE MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | TECHNOLOGY BASED TRAINING AND EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING IN-HOUSE AND ON-SITE CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, AND WORKSHOPS IN THE AREA OF IMPLEMENTING SOLUTIONS FOR PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN COMPUTER NETWORKS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION, NAMELY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION SERVICES; COMPUTER APPLICATION SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC TESTING SERVICES; INSTALLATION AND MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER NETWORKS; ON SITE AND REMOTE MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE AND E-MAIL; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; COMPUTER DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DATA RECOVERY SERVICES; MONITORING COMPUTER SYSTEMS OF OTHERS AND PROVIDING BACK-UP COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES; COMPUTER SERVICES NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEBSITES AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WEBSITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NewTel Information
- Other trademarks owned by NewTel Information
- Other trademarks owned by BELL ALIANT REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by BELL ALIANT REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by ALIANT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by XWAVE SOLUTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by XWAVE SOLUTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BELL CANADA
- Other trademarks owned by BELL CANADA
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XWAVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |