USPTO serial 75615769
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario M5R 2E1, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Hoffman
DAVID L HOFFMAN CISLO & THOMAS LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | oral care and hygiene products and health and beauty aids, namely, dental cleansers, dentifrice, breath sprays, toothpaste, oral rinses, mouthwash, mouth cleaning tablets, and dental floss | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | oral care and hygiene products and health and beauty aids; namely, toothbrushes and cleansing preparations for oral care devices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |