USPTO serial 75619410
WHITE RUFFY BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2381955Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2000
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHITE RUFFY BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WATSONVILLE, CA
Clovis, CA
Clovis, CA
FRESNO, CA
FRESNO, CA
Watsonville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole F. Barrett
Carole F. Barrett Barrett IP Law201 Spear St., Suite 1100San Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [Fresh and] frozen fish | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 18, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VALLEY FRESH SEAFOOD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC RIM ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC RIM ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ESPINOSA, MICHAEL R.
- Other trademarks owned by WHITE RUFFY SEAFOOD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WRT Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named WHITE RUFFY BRAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2000 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |