USPTO serial 75620500
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Roppel
Andrew Roppel Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749ATTN: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PUBLICATIONS, namely, A SERIES OF NONFICTION BOOKS CONCERNING HOBBIES, COLLECTIBLES, AUCTIONS, AND A WIDE VARIETY OF PRODUCTS RELATING TO ANTIQUES, ART, LITERATURE, CULTURE, TECHNOLOGY, TRAVEL, SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, HOME FURNISHINGS, GARDEN ITEMS, MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, MOTOR VEHICLES, TOYS AND GAMES, FASHION, JEWELRY, ELECTRONICS, PHOTOGRAPHY, HOLIDAY RELATED ITEMS, FILM AND VIDEO; PAPER AND STATIONERY ITEMS, namely, [ GREETING CARDS, ] MEMORANDUM BOARDS, MEMO PADS, [ PAPER POSTCARDS, ] STATIONERY, PENS [, BUMPER STICKERS, CALENDARS AND DECORATIVE STICKERS AND DECALS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2024 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2024 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Feb 18, 2024 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 23, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |