USPTO serial 75621157
CLICK2CALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLICK2CALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Foycik, Jr.
MICHAEL J FOYCIK JR1718 M ST NW #255WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE AND DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |