Drawing for XDSL3

USPTO serial 75629318

XDSL3

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSAYA, LISA W.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XDSL3?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel R. McClure

DANIEL R MCCLURE THOMAS, KAYDEN HORSTEMEYER & RISLEYSTE 1500100 GALLERIA PKWY N WATLANTA, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications products, namely, high speed telecommunications connectivity equipment for data communications, namely, computer chips that combine data/voice over high speed digital telephone linesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 28, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance