USPTO serial 75632635
ISERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Province of Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan Kasper
ALAN KASPER SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 700 & 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications gateway services, namely the electronic transmission of voice, data and documents from the analog Public Switched Digital Network (PSTN) to a digital data network and from the digital data network to the analog PSTN; telecommunications gateway services, namely the electronic transmission of voice, data and documents from a personal computer to a facsimile machine, a telephone handset or to another personal computer; data, voice and image telecommunications via electronic transmission of data, voice and images via computer terminal; facsimile transmission | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |