Drawing for CORECARD

USPTO serial 75647826

CORECARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORECARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce J. Goldner

BRUCE J GOLDNER SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6522UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-PAID DEBIT, CREDIT AND TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS, ALL MAGNETICALLY ENCODED; TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, COMPUTERS, DATA PROCESSORS AND CALL PROCESSING SOFTWARE FOR TRANSACTING DEBIT CARD SERVICES AND SOLD AS A UNIT; CELLULAR TELEPHONES FOR USE WITH DEBIT CELLULAR CALLING CARDSACTIVE—
016PRE-PAID DEBIT, CREDIT AND TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS NOT MAGNETICALLY ENCODEDACTIVE—
036TELEPHONE DEBIT CARD SERVICES AND TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICESACTIVE—
038TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING DISCOUNT DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE SERVICES, DIRECT DIAL INTERNATIONAL CALLING AND CONFERENCE CALLING SERVICES, THROUGH THE USE OF TELECOMMUNICATION CARDS ISSUED SOLELY BY THE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES AND PROVIDING BACKBONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SERVICES TO OTHERS TO ENABLE THEM TO CONNECT TO A GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK AND ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA VIA COMPUTER TERMINAL BY WIRE, SATELLITE, MICROWAVE OR CABLE TRANSMISSION; LEASING AND RENTAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH TELECOMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT; WIRELESS DIGITAL AND CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance