USPTO serial 75654877
CFO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CFO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for finance professionals used to assist in performing or creating-- Corporate profiles; Business plans; Financing plans; SBA and bank loan packages; Financial projections and cash flow planning reports; "What-if' scenarios; Company budgets; Departmental and project budgets; Mergers and acquisitions due diligence analyses and reports; Business valuations; Business surveys; Reorganizations, workouts, and restructuring analyses and reports; Trend analyses, industry comparisons, and benchmark analyses and reports; Financial ratio analyses and reports; Capital budgeting decision analyses and reports; Current asset availability analyses and reports; Breakeven analyses and reports; Lease vs buy analyses and reports; Cost of capital analyses and reports; ROI analyses and reports; Loan amortization schedules | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |