USPTO serial 75656709
MALLTITUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MALLTITUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Regina S4P 3Y2 Saskatchewan, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen H. Sorensen
KRISTEN H SORENSEN HUNTON & WILLIAMS200 PARK AVE 43RD FLNEW YORK, NY 10166-0136UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in the following-- providing access to on-line databases; creating, uploading, hosting a website that aggregates merchant store fronts allowing shoppers to browse and buy goods and services in the a secure environment; providing access to a global computer information network; providing a secure system for information providers to distribute and transmit their applications, products, data, and services to on-line consumers; providing a software encrypted system for information providers to distribute and transmit their applications, products, data, and services to on-line consumers; maintaining user profiles associated with consumers accessing on-line databases, applications and services of information providers, such as billing information and consumer services preferences; providing access to telecommunications gateway, specifically a payment gateway, as a router for incoming and outgoing messages to and from a global computer information network; operating system software for use in controlling a computer hardware interface between credit card processing systems and merchants on the global computer information network; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network, specifically for use in consolidating merchant transactions into a single transaction routing system to check data received in incoming messages, for use in converting message formats to user requirement, for providing consumers the ability to obtain electronic contact with merchants to initiate transactions; for use in verifying digital signatures; for use in encrypting and decrypting electronic data; and manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Jan 4, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |