USPTO serial 75657658
INTERSCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERSCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 4X3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brant Latham
BRANT LATHAM RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERTSTE 2900, 2 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | office furniture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |