USPTO serial 75662214
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cressline Distributing Company
Chico, CA
Cressline Distributing Company
Chico, CA
Cressline Distributing Company
Chico, CA
CHICO, CA
CHICO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher S. Tuttle
Christopher S. Tuttle Alleman Hall Creasman & Tuttle LLP900 SW 5th AveSuite 2300Portland, OR 97204| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | wholesale distributorships featuring jump rope | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 1, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 18, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 2, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |