USPTO serial 75666431
NO BUST BLACKJACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2000
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NO BUST BLACKJACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chino Hills, CA
Chino Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James G. O'Neill
JAMES G O'NEILL3151 AIRWAY AVE STE K-105COSTA MESA, CA 92626-4613UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | GAMES, NAMELY, A CARD GAME | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |