USPTO serial 75666464
DUPLICITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUPLICITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent D. Sokol
CHRISTA M COLE CALIFORNIA TAN INC10877 WILSHIRE BLVD 12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, GELS, LOTIONS, OILS, HAIR MOUSSES, BATH GELS SCENTED BODY SPRAYS, BATH FOAM, SKIN CLEANSERS, MOISTURIZERS, SUNSCREEN, BATH GELS, NON-MEDICATED HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIPSTICK, LIP OIL, FACE POWDER, CREAM ROUGE, CAKE ROUGE, LIQUID ROUGE, MASCARA, CAKE MAKE-UP, EYEBROW PENCILS, EYE SHADOW; AND NAIL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NAIL LACQUERS, AND NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |