USPTO serial 75668959
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Milton Keynes MK1 IPT, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B. LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer telephony equipment, namely, speech processing and recognition platforms, audio recorders and audio players, dialers, tone and pulse detectors, matrix conferencing platforms, signal processors, telephone interfaces; protocol converters, multiport concentrators, least cost routers, video conferencing platforms, data communicators, facsimile machines, calling automators, bidirectional callers, call charters; telecommunications equipment, namely, speech processing and recognition platforms, audio recorders and audio players, dialers, tone and pulse detectors, matrix conferencing platforms, signal processors, telephone interfaces; protocol converters, multiport concentrators, least cost routers, video conferencing platforms, data communicators, facsimile machines, calling automators, bidrectional callers, call chargers; computer software relating to telecommunications for speech processing and recognition, audio recording and audio playing, dialing, tone and pulse detection, matrix conferencing, signal processing, telephone interfacing; protocol converters, multiport concentrators, least cost routings, video conferencing sessions, data communication, facsimile transmission, automated calling, bidirectional calling, call charging, call information; speech processors; circuit boards for computers; integrated circuits; and parts for all aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |