USPTO serial 75670381
BONGO CATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BONGO CATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game cartridges, computer game cassettes, and computer game tapes; video game cartridges, video game cassettes; prerecorded audio cassettes, prerecorded video cassettes, prerecorded audio tapes, prerecorded video tapes, prerecorded compact discs and phonograph records featuring music and motion picture sound tracks; multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM featuring music and motion picture sound tracks; computer operating system software; prerecorded multimedia computer software programs featuring music and motion picture sound tracks; interactive multimedia software programs for entertainment, namely, adventure stories and animated stories; interactive multimedia software for playing games; sunglasses, kaleidoscopes, and 3-D reels with viewers, prerecorded audio cassettes, compact discs, and laser video discs featuring music, stories, activities and other such educational and entertainment topics for children; prerecorded video cassettes featuring animated entertainment; multimedia computer software featuring music, stories, activities and other such educational and entertainment topics for children; motion picture films featuring animated entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |