USPTO serial 75684643
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
RADFORD, VA
RADFORD, VA
RADFORD, VA
BIOLOGICAL & POPULAR CULTURE, INC.
Radford, VA
Other trademarks owned by BIOLOGICAL & POPULAR CULTURE, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Rosenthal
Robert E. Rosenthal Howard IP Law Group, PCPO Box 226Fort Washington, PA 19034UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTACT MANAGEMENT; COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING ELECTRONIC MESSAGES AND VOICEMAIL; COMPUTER MESSAGING SOFTWARE FOR CLASSIFYING, STORING AND TRANSMITTING ELECTRONIC VOICE AND DATA MESSAGES OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS AND TELEPHONE NETWORKS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR CLASSIFYING, ORGANIZING, AND STANDARDIZING VOICE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, MESSAGES, AND OTHER BUSINESS INFORMATION; CALL CENTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGEMENT OF CALL CENTERS AND FOR MONITORING AND RECORDING CALL CENTER TELEPHONE COMPUTER TRANSACTIONS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 6, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |