USPTO serial 75687701
IOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik B Cherdak
ERIK B CHERDAK ERIK B CHERDAK & ASSOCIATES LLC11300 ROCKVILLE PIKE STE 906ROCKVILLE, MD 20852-3034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGNING WEB SITES FEATURING GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES THAT FACILITATE ACCESS TO DATA AND INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET AND OTHER GLOBAL, LOCAL AND INHOUSE NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |